Reply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16639151)
Yeah....and nasa has 100s of dead astronauts who sacrificed their lives to learn how to land on the moon, don't they? If it was fake, it would be zero deaths and 100% success.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15870693)
Search Walking the Moon doggy. Such a good read. Good view of what was happening around the landings and such.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16639151)
Can you imagine coming in at 1000s of MPH, descending at totally unfamiliar rates, with no atmosphere, and an unfamiliar terrain? All without computers(modern)?
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16639151)
The debris would have been scattered for 100s of miles along the surface.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15870693)
I really love the part of walking the moon doggy where he jokingly quotes the russians as saying, "Gee we put all this hard work and all these people put SO much time and their lives to get to the...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 13806508)
The Lunar X Prize is offering bonuses for lunar robots that can take images of Apollo landing sites; the deadline for that is 2015. It will be interesting to see how the moon hoax believers will try to...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 13806508)
It certainly wasn't unfamiliar rates of descent or unfamiliar terrain.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 1613303)
I perused their guidelines , looks like a 2km boundary around heritage sites for any landing type craft or flybys. Looks like ROV's can get alot closer but by their guidelines, this rov can only land...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 14197539)
What a play on perception by deception. They never wnt to the moon and to prove they didn't, they made this up to reinforce there agenda cover so people quiz we had to have gone there if they make a...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15982971)
the moon landings remind me of a thunderbirds episode. and I was watching a documentary about Apollo 13 and the NASA command chief was wearing a freemason ring. I hate how America believes they landed...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 851621)
Yeah....and nasa has 100s of dead astronauts huh? :scratching:
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 851621)
If memory serves, all the early astronuts were freemasons.
View ArticleReply by Skin Suit
It's okay. I've been to the arizona desert already. I've seen the site.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
At least they'll be allowed close enough to finally get us some decent pictures of the landing sites.
View ArticleReply by nomuse (not logged in) (UID 2380183)
No, it couldn't. Anyone who knows even the most basic stuff about space travel knows that. For any kind of rocket system, top among the basic numbers one would want to know about it is the Delta-V....
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
What about if its cargo bay had of been full of extra rocket fuel?
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 10105687)
as fake as Hollywood fakers were capable to do it :5a:
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16752375)
Japanese JAXA was veeery close to the surface and made the full map again in HI definition quality but were NOT allowed to publish the fake landing sites. All in the name of "science" (pardon, I mean...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
Japanese JAXA was veeery close to the surface and made the full map again in HI definition quality but were NOT allowed to publish the fake landing sites. All in the name of "science" (pardon, I mean...
View ArticleReply by Scuba7
Why not? What would you US citizens do if Obama came out and said the Moon Landing was BS, they shot JFK, they were behind 9/11, etc, etc? We all know the truth now. If they were to admit it, the only...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16723531)
"Keep Out: NASA Asks Future Moon Visitors to dont even go close to Apollo landing, Final proof its fake...." There is a huge moon base on the moon and they have been bulding it for the last 40yrs. But...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15684685)
Just because Nasa does not want anyoen else there does not prove it fake. THere are other possibliities, eg... 1. Because they found something that they want to keep under raps such as alien artifacts,...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15684685)
...Or possibl even more embarrassing... 4. Non-alien artifacts, eg, A Tim Horton's Roll-up-the-rim coffee cup in a Loblaws bag next to a Canadian flag, planted ten years before the Yankies arrived.
View ArticleReply by The Guy
Wait, so NASA never went because it's impossible to cross the Van Allen belts without literal tons of shielding, right? And so, to cover up the fact that they never went, NASA as asking other people to...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16754011)
It's really simple. They want it to be a kind of perpetual memorial of the first trip to the moon. Other people going there will ruin the pristine nature of the area. Nothing else, lunatics.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
Only those with an open and questioning mind can understand what the issue here is.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 15342156)
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16755168)
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
Would you care to elaborate on your source of the radiation measurement data, and what technology you are referring to? Thanks.
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 16751300)
Isn't math wonderful? :coffee4: [/quote] Yeah, and the de-orbiting was controlled entirely by the autonomous, and untested descent computer, with 100% success each time- an amazing achievement when...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 14372276)
I don't mind people going to the moon to visit but I don't like to see them tossing their garbage out their space windows like the moon is their own private garbage dump! :tdown:
View ArticleReply by The Guy
Isn't math wonderful? :coffee4: [/quote] Yeah, and the de-orbiting was controlled entirely by the autonomous, and untested descent computer, with 100% success each time- an amazing achievement when...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 14143765)
No, it was the fact that they couldn't build a heavy lifting rocket to get there that stopped them from going. Even still they didn't stop their Moon program until 1974. And their lander did not have...
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 14143765)
No the shuttle couldn't have gone to the Moon. It did not have the Delta V to get there and back. Even if you could have strapped on a couple extra boosters to give it the extra thrust, it wasn't...
View ArticleReply by MOONKEEPER (UID 9863182)
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View ArticleReply by citizenperth
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 14143765)
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View ArticleReply by Anonymous Coward (UID 10105687)
different times, different tech, different protection. its is a scientific fact that the thickness and material used on the moon mission would not have been able to stop the radiation in any way....
View Article
